Sweeping machines are becoming more and more rampant. This promising market is being dominated by well-known sweeping robot brands. How would you choose the right one?
Where do you expect it to be more distinctive?
How would you arrange it to work?
......
I think the following article may be able to give you a lost reference.
There are exactly two machines on hand, one sweeping machine within the show that is doing the best, and one is the elegant Q2 of Fomatt. Although one of the two types is a pure type of sweeping robot, one has a sweeping machine and a mopping function at the same time, but as a matter of fairness, this article only compares the functions of sweeping.
The inner sweeper followed the mainstream on the package and used a separate packaging method between the consumables and the main machine. Moreover, the orange and silver themed packaging style is in contrast with the original orange theme color of the sweeper. The one-piece matching method is easy for users to like. At the very least, I will not litter the box with the packaging style.
The consumables for the flat box include a lot of spare filters, cleaning brushes and one-sided brushes. It is worth mentioning that inxni also provides a special screwdriver for users to use in the accessories; part of the main box contains a sweeper And charging base and so on. The whole package should be said to be more satisfying. I rarely write about packaging. Why can this package attract attention? Just because it's packaging style is really fashionable.
The Format Elegant Q2 is a robot with sweeping function and mopping function. According to my imagination, this sweeping robot should be bigger, at least it should be able to fit under the same split packaging style. Such a big thing, but the fact is beyond my expectations.
In addition to being similar to using the same body color as the inner sweeper robot, the Fairmont Elegant Q2 has nothing in common with the host. A single kraft box style packaging, and the consumables and the fuselage are all put together. It's a little messy, but it saves money.
Contrast: In fact, there really is no need to say packaging, but such high prices of inxni, and it is exhibited in a well-known exhibition such as AWE, will inevitably work on the cost of packaging, which is the facade, is also consistent with high-end products As a result, the packaging is very good looking, all kinds of tall, and split type packaging is easy to tell the user, hey! I am different from others, and the Fairmont Elegant Q2 is another packaging style, practical, material-based, it is no wonder that this machine Fomalt is after all launched from the crowdfunding platform, the main cost is the main It is understandable to be inferior to the packaging.
The other accessories have been mentioned above, and we won't talk about it here. The Inxni Sweeper's charging base also does a great job, and the round toot cushion is very interesting. Actually, the charging base of this sweeping machine doesn't need to be so big. However, what is the reason why it is still designed so big?
In my opinion, one of its large hollow partitions should be a collision avoidance section module, which has no other meaning; and because the sweeper itself is too heavy, the charging base needs some weight to prevent charging. The base was towed away by the sweeper. (Really, I did not know where to put this charging cradle when using it for the first time. I didn't tear off the adhesive pad of the charging cradle. The result was really a sweeping machine. Take away the entire charging base.)
Before talking about the docking station of Fomatt, let us talk about its own remote control. You know, inside the accessories, the sweeper is not equipped with a remote control. Although I have seen the remote control of the sweeper still on the tall, but obviously I do not have a remote control. Obviously, the internal sweeper company is to persist what they think of as intelligence, lose the cumbersome and complicated remote control, either manually let the sweeper work, or remotely through the mobile phone APP.
The Fomalt's charging base is also the "savings"-based, far less than half the size of the inxni sweeper. However, it also has an infrared receiver to charge the navigation machine, and also provides a bottom charging, magnetic suction.
Contrast: Obviously, if you compare the color value of the charging base, it is still better than the inxni sweeper. However, Fomalt's remote control is obviously more grounded than inxni. Although the remote operation of the mobile phone APP and the operation of the machine are not impossible, the simple operation mode of the remote control is more suitable for the habits of the elderly at home. The inxni sweeper stubbornly lost this traditional thing. It was a bit too self-possessed.
Even if it is for young people, I may not like to open the APP before operating the sweeper. Speaking about the part of the function behind, maybe you will understand! Obviously, in this respect, the sweeping machine inside is to lack some considerations.
Before referring to the issue of consumables, let's take a look at the differences in the structure of the main working areas of the two sweepers: First, the obvious part comes from the part of the brush, and Fomalt designed the part of the mopping. The space occupied a lot, so the design of the bottom working area is a bilateral brushing mode, and then a vacuum cleaner box is used for the preliminary clean sweeping work. The final finish is given to the mopping area; it is clear that the inxni sweeps the floor. The machine is very pure, it is not designed as a double brush mode. The single brush + roller brush + glue brush constitutes the entire sweeping work part. In terms of the detail of the work, the sweeper is obviously delicate.
But there is no one who is better and who is slightly worse. Because of the different work designs, they can adapt to different home users and environments. This point will also be contrasted in the following functional parts! However, at least we can know that in the face of an uncomplicated environment, Fomalta can clean it by brushing the vacuum cleaner box bilaterally. However, if it encounters an extreme ground environment, it will appear to be very clean. Power is not good, but the sweeper is not the same, it can adapt to different environments, unilateral brush is responsible for the simple cleaning work, roll brush is responsible for those parts of the ground that are not easy to sweep the side brush to clean up, and then The cleaning work is done with a glue brush and a vacuum cleaner.
Therefore, the consumables of the two are obviously very different!
The inner sweeper is only a single sided brush, so it is only equipped with a single sided brush consumable. In the consumables box, another spare consumable is the dust box filter, and the other thing is left with a screwdriver and a cleaning tool. The maintenance of the brush, it can be said that the supplies are really simple, the inner sweeper is more to throw its work content to the roller brush and the adhesive brush, the right side of the single-sided brush seems to be more is defined as auxiliary Work; and Fomalt is not the same, in addition to the same as the inside of the cleaning and maintenance of the brush and the dust box filter, it provides a pair of brushes, because the design of the Fairmont was originally a bilateral brush construction It is normal that matching matching gifts are also a pair of brushes.
Contrast: From the part of consumables, we can guess ahead of time. For sweepers, it is more concerned with the process of sweeping and vacuuming. Therefore, a combination of multiple brush constructions forms a combo box for the sweeping tools of the plot. However, Fumat is not the same, because it has taken into account the function of the mopping, so after the rough construction of the bilateral brush plus dust box structure, and then through the part of the mop to carry out late cleaning supplements. No one is better, just look at what kind of ground environment the two targets. However, it is clear that the considerations for the addition of the mopping-up function of the Format Elegant Q2 will be more thoughtful. After all, I bought a sweeping machine that cannot be simply cleaned but not dragged on. The dust will not suck, and the wet ground will look good.
Since the sweeper is designed with a single-sided brush, it is not so frequently replaced. Therefore, its fixing is achieved through the single dew dismantling and fixing. When disassembling, it must be supplemented with a screwdriver; but when dismantling the dust box and the roller brush, it is only necessary to deduct the card position by hand and it can be simple. We remove these things and perform consumable replacement and cleaning maintenance.
Fumat's replacement and disassembly of consumable parts is another view. The replacement of the bilateral brushes is very simple. It is very simple to press and hold the buckles to disassemble and install them. It can be completely manual, without a screwdriver; because there is no part of the brush Therefore, when replacing consumables and cleaning, it is OK to open the dust box, and it can be removed manually.
Comparison: Both of the dust boxes are of a general size, but one is designed to be removable on the side, and Fomatt is designed to remove the top. The other is no different. From the perspective of the replacement of consumables, Fairmont is a little better off. After all, pure manual can do ah ~ ~ I can not use tools to carry out maintenance, if the tool is not put well, need to maintain, replace consumables, but also when looking around screwdriver may not be good, but the elderly knife is also not moving guns Suitable. Since it can be replaced manually, of course, the Fairmont is more grounded ~
When photographed, I forgot to take apart the battery of Fumart's elegant Q2 to see, miss ~~. From the official website to understand the situation is that the elegant Q2's battery capacity is about 2500mAh, while the inside sweeper is about 2600mAh, the difference between the two battery capacity is not much, so from this point of view, the two batteries fully charged time It should not be much worse.
This is a tie!
There are other things like the power roller, the dust box and the filter screen, which are not related to each other. The contrast is not very significant. It is important for us to talk about the wet drag section of the Fairmont Q2, although the inner sweeper itself does not have this part.
The Fairmont Q2 wet-drag system consists of two parts, a large-sized mop and a plastic water tank (feeling that the mop is a little cheaper). The principle of the elegant Q2's mopping system is not complicated. After impounding a modest storage tank, the principle of self-seepage through the three openings into the blue mop area, and then the mop work.
However, during the process of loading water, the water tank is prone to leaking water. After all, the water tank itself is not strictly closed. When the ground is dragged, this problem does not occur. If you want to come, this place should be improved.
Contrast: In this respect, no one is better. However, there is obviously a little more market for a fumat that has a mopping function.
The color of the whole sweeper is based on warm orange and dark gray. The whole body is designed with a sense of science and technology. The “inxni†logo design, the crash bar, and the “∞†symbol of the touch button are visible. The upswings are all very tall, so it is not difficult to think that the prices within the interior are so high. While the public view of the Q2 Fumalte uses the same color, but it is also orange, but it is bright orange + silver master The main color tone, the structure of the machine is mainly practical, even the buttons are physical buttons, the top of the "clear" is the only function of a start button.
Contrast: From the point of view of value, the sweeping machine still dominates within, and the entire part of the touch-sensitive “∞†button on the top is the operation interface. Automatic cleaning, fixed-point cleaning, scheduled reservation, return charge, and even time display are all Yes, apparently, the premise of not using a remote control inside the sweeper is that of living in it; but Fairmont’s is more practical. It has a “clear†button on the fuselage, and after pressing it starts work and there is no other. Extra functions, other work is given to the remote control. Who is better? This is no better than that. However, in the face of most users, it is clear that the operation of the remote control is more in line with the needs of ordinary people. The sweeper is to consider the fashionable functions pursued by young users, but ignores most of the use. The crowd, you know, I've been using the remote control several times when you're bow-sweeping the sweeper. Obviously, in this section, the Fairmaster Q2 is more grounded.
As mentioned earlier, there are so many things that do not exist. In fact, the most important thing that everyone pays to buy a sweeping robot to go home is of course its actual sweeping effect. Nothing else is used. This chapter will briefly explain this section.
(Preliminary summary, because at the time of shooting the sweeper, there was no intention to use different garbage to test its ability in these areas, so the text is the main text, and Fomalt has pictures.)
8.1 Anti-collision, drilling table bottomThe difference in the housing environment of each person also brings problems to modern sweeping robots. Therefore, one of the most basic functions of sweeping robots is to use infrared to avoid obstacles and prevent collisions. After all, the title of “robot†cannot be too stupid. The official introduction of elegant Q2 can avoid obstacles with a width of 2CM or more, and the sweeping machine inside is even more powerful. Basically, it will advance obstacles in advance and open more ahead of schedule.
What is the black mirror area in front of the side of the sweeper in front of the black part of the eye? It turns out that this is an important part of the high-resolution laser detector in the inxni structure. It can update the frequency of 108,000 times per minute to build a map. At the same time, respond to emergencies, such as avoiding obstacles, predicting the width of tables, etc.
In actual use, in fact, the internal sweeper still has a collision. Although it is not much, it shows that its obstacle avoidance is not so sensitive. However, I have observed dozens of times that each collision has actually occurred. Purpose, if it is about to go through the bottom of the table is not sure whether it can drill past, it will try to work through the collision, and then work; Moreover, this laser detector is still very sensitive, it will drill the table every time it automatically cleaned it At the bottom, I think that it should be after the map is constructed and the conclusions are reached that it will be given priority to clean up this area, and that it will be given priority to vacuuming and cleaning up the larger particles and garbage.
Just like the inside sweeper, the Fairmont Elegant Q2 also starts drilling the bottom of the table when it starts the automatic sweeping mode, as if it had something like it under the table. The elegant Q2 has the same powerful "eye" as the inside sweeper. It helps him to avoid obstacles and get into the bottom of the table at any time. Because the Q2 is a little thin in the thickness of the whole machine, it is like a sofa underneath such a sofa. It can also go in and out of the busy and keep the dust under the table clean.
When testing the Obstacle Q2's obstacle avoidance function, if it is not manual mode, it can generally avoid obstacles in advance to avoid collision, but if it is switched to manual mode, this collision can not be avoided. Elegant Q2 also has a priority level for "garbage classification". If there is a relatively obvious garbage particle around it, it will immediately run away with garbage when it starts up, and then it will start drilling the bottom of the table again.
Contrast: In the anti-collision, in fact, the performance of the two is similar. And they all have the ability to build maps. However, when the cleaning is started, the elegant Q2 will reflect it earlier and build it while working in the cleaning work; while the inside is not, when it starts the automatic cleaning, there will be A few seconds of the reaction (in fact, scanning the panorama and building the map) was only followed by work, and the elegant Q2 would be a little faster in terms of speed, with no intuitive data, but it was a two-step move.
We all know that some people have a threshold in their homes, so if you want to set sweeping robots to sweep the entire house, he will need to pass through these places. Obviously, the robot has to consider that too high a threshold will cause the sweeping robot to fall. Therefore, this anti-drop test is unavoidable.
Put the two sweepers on a small table. Every time they can stop moving when they are in the race, it won't go down! The accuracy of the two machines is similar to the environment; it is worth noting that when the sweeper sweeps through these thresholds, it will pass through the harsh environment of the carpet, and a protective fence is designed with the brush of the sweeper inside, so even if it is soft It is also necessary for the rug to be swept in. It is also possible that the sweeper can pass through such a place, but it will be a mess every time the rug is made; the elegant Q2 behaves exactly the same way. When it is still open, but if it is put on a "mop", there are still opportunities to get stuck there when passing through such a place.
The structure of the sweeper inside is more detailed. I always think that the sweeping effect will be better. Who knows ~~ tried to throw two different kinds of trash around the sweeper, and the inxni sweeper is the first time to start sweeping. Found, however, it needs to be cleaned several times before and after; if it is a bigger particle or garbage, it will take more time. The sweeping effect is also OK, but the efficiency is actually a bit worse.
Format's elegant Q2 is another kind of state to deal with the size particles, perhaps thanks to the benefits of bilateral brushing, cleaning up to objects like paper towels, small particles like biscuit crumbs can instantly clean into Inside the dust box. No need for secondary cleaning, as long as the automatic mode is turned on and the trash is in its immediate vicinity, it automatically runs back and forth towards the garbage and cleans the floor.
You will ask, does it need to repeat the sweep back and forth? No need. How is its cleaning effect? To deal with these dry garbage cleaning, Format achieved the cleaning efficiency and effectiveness of the grounding gas. Anyway, when I was satisfied!
Comparison: As mentioned above, the inner sweeping robot and the elegant Fairmont Q2 are very different in construction. What kind of effect can the single-sided brush and the bilateral brush make? The result of sweeping is already very obvious. Perhaps, for those places where the environment is complex and where there are many small dust particles, internal sweepers are more advantageous; however, for millions of ordinary people, sweeping robots such as Format are more people needs. On the other hand, sweeping efficiency was achieved; second, sweeping results were excellent. This is what the real sweeping robots should do.
The working noise of sweeping robots should also be a topic of concern to many people. Both sweepers can make a scheduled sweeping when no one is at home. However, there are always times when you don’t like it, so suppose you’re watching TV. When it's time, let it go to the ground and the sound it sends will not be annoying?
When the internal sweeper was working at 68.4dBa, the ambient noise at that time was 48.9dBa. This conversion also increased the noise level of about 20 dBa, which is not too great. It is reasonable to say that people will not be upset when watching TV.
For the elegant Q2's work noise value, I did not test it and it was slightly smaller than it was. Therefore, in this respect, in fact, domestic sweepers have been considered, and in the absence of impact on use, such work noise should be acceptable to most people.
Both machines can automatically find the function of the battery. Obviously, you can do it manually or remotely. It will not hinder the accuracy of the battery. The instruction of the inside sweeper mentioned that, when the opening action is performed, it must be near 0.5m0.5m near the charging cartridge, which will affect its accuracy in automatically finding the charging cartridge. The internal sweeping machine can be very accurate during the test process. Finding the location of the charging station and automatically standing up to let the electric contact come into contact with electricity is very good. What is the performance of the elegant Q2? The same performance is also good, but because it does not use things to fix its charge, so when the charge is somewhat rickety, but in fact it can already find the location of the battery.
The result of the comparison is that they are almost the same!
Both sweeping robots can be remotely controlled by mobile phones. It is worth mentioning that the apps for sweeping machines inside are more graphical and more beautiful. Especially when sweeping robots build maps and sweeping work, you will find the entire mobile phone. The APP is a blockbuster of video footage of the house. On the other hand, since the elegant Q2 has a large killer such as a remote control, I rarely use the mobile phone APP. However, it is still less sophisticated than the inner sweeper.
It is worth mentioning that the two mobile phone remote control connection methods are all using wireless network protocols. When connected, your mobile phone can't be connected to the Internet. So, I don't like to use the mobile phone for command work!
In terms of price, Fairmont Elegant Q2 really is a relatively high value product, as long as 999 yuan can buy back; and within the sweeping machine has so far been prohibitively high prices - 3298 yuan youth version. Obviously, the Fairmont Elegant Q2 is more concerned with the use and price acceptance of the general public, and the price of sweepers within inxni tends to be more high-end, which can be seen from its structure and design.
Where is the practical significance of sweeping robots? Sometimes speaking through text is not intuitive.
See what you dare to think about the map above? Sad? Distressed? Have it. Maybe you have a young life, there is nothing to do when cleaning your own little home. Raise the table and get into the corner. These things are really nothing for young and strong. If you live with your parents, Together, I dare to say that most people are like the ones on the map. Parents will not let you do these heavy work. So they go into battle personally. They go to lift tables of dozens of kilos to clean the table only. Rubbish and dust. But what if you have a sweeping robot?
If there is a ground-sweeping robot like Fumota, will they use it to do such heavy things? They can include grandsons, they can sit comfortably on the sofa watching TV programs they like to watch, and you can do their own thing on the side. This is what modern technology has brought us! Sweeping robots will become more and more important in your life, I believe!